Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2015

State v. Brightman

State v. Brightman
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided October 21, 2015

State v. Brightman

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Lenard Brightman, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-000313

Appeal From Charleston County W. Jeffrey Young, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-494 Submitted August 1, 2015 – Filed October 21, 2015

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, and Lenard Brightman, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.