State v. Smith
State v. Smith
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. James Patrick Smith, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-000921
Appeal From Spartanburg County Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-502 Submitted September 1, 2015 – Filed November 4, 2015
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Tiffany L. Butler, of Columbia; and James Patrick Smith, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.