State v. McKever
State v. McKever
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Austen Syntell McKever, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-002707
Appeal From Florence County D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-060 Submitted December 1, 2015 – Filed February 17, 2016
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Tiffany Lorraine Butler, of Columbia; and Austen Syntell McKever, pro se, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.