Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2016

State v. Boozer

State v. Boozer
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided March 30, 2016

State v. Boozer

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Rashondre Montese Boozer, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002536

Appeal From Spartanburg County Gordon G. Cooper, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-154 Submitted January 1, 2016 – Filed March 30, 2016

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.