State v. Ganson
State v. Ganson
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Beneco Antwon Ganson, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-001402
Appeal From Lancaster County Brian M. Gibbons, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-107 Submitted January 1, 2016 – Filed March 2, 2016
AFFIRMED
Appellant Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Interim Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Randy E. Newman, Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693-94 (2003) ("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court]. Issues not raised and ruled upon in the trial court will not be considered on appeal."); id. at 142, 587 S.E.2d at 694 ("A party may not argue one ground at trial and an alternate ground on appeal.").
AFFIRMED.1 WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.