State v. Chiles
State v. Chiles
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. David Wince Chiles, Jr., Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-002533
Appeal From Greenville County Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-108 Submitted January 1, 2016 – Filed March 2, 2016
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia; and David Wince Chiles, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Interim Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 SHORT, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.