State v. Robinson
State v. Robinson
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Otis Robinson, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2013-002392
Appeal From Charleston County R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-273 Submitted May 1, 2016 – Filed June 8, 2016
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Otis Robinson, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT and THOMAS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.