Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2016

State v. Ard

State v. Ard
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided June 1, 2016

State v. Ard

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Stewart Randall Ard, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-001463

Appeal From Richland County James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-243 Submitted January 1, 2016 – Filed June 1, 2016

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, and Solicitor Daniel Edward Johnson, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, A.C.J., and WILLIAMS and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.