Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2016

State v. Taylor

State v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided August 3, 2016
State v. Taylor

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Furman Eugene Taylor, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2015-000066

Appeal From Greenville County

D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-390

Submitted April 1, 2016 – Filed August 3, 2016

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Furman Eugene Taylor, Jr., pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.