State v. Taylor
State v. Taylor
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Furman Eugene Taylor, Jr., Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2015-000066
Appeal From Greenville County D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-390 Submitted April 1, 2016 – Filed August 3, 2016
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Furman Eugene Taylor, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.