State v. Wilson
State v. Wilson
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Annie Victoria Wilson, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2015-002028
Appeal From Aiken County Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-051 Submitted December 1, 2016 – Filed January 25, 2017
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, and Annie Victoria Wilson, pro se, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF and SHORT, JJ., and MOORE, A.J., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.