Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2017

State v. Hilliard

State v. Hilliard
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided January 25, 2017
State v. Hilliard

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Vaughn Hilliard, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2015-001369

Appeal From Charleston County Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-048

Submitted December 1, 2016 – Filed January 25, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, and Vaughn Hilliard, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, all for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1 HUFF and SHORT, JJ., and MOORE, A.J., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.