State v. Knight
State v. Knight
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Coy Lamar Knight, Jr., Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2015-002183
Appeal From Lancaster County Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-035 Submitted November 1, 2016 – Filed January 11, 2017
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, and Coy Lamar Knight, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.