State v. Telford
State v. Telford
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Nathan Tyrone Telford, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2015-002665
Appeal From Richland County Robert E. Hood, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-083 Submitted January 1, 2017 – Filed February 15, 2017
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Benjamin John Tripp, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 HUFF and SHORT, JJ., and MOORE, A.J., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.