State v. Pearson
State v. Pearson
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Kalven Terry Pearson, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2015-002040
Appeal From Clarendon County Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-076 Submitted December 1, 2016 – Filed February 8, 2017
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.