State v. Wingate
State v. Wingate
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Tamarquis Antwain Wingate, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-002717
Appeal From Florence County Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-064 Submitted November 1, 2016 – Filed February 1, 2017
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia; and Tamarquis Antwain Wingate, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF and SHORT, JJ., and MOORE, A.J., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.