Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2017

State v. Ragin

State v. Ragin
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided March 8, 2017
State v. Ragin

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent, v. Lorenzo Ragin, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-000287

Appeal From Sumter County Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-113

Submitted February 1, 2017 – Filed March 8, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED.1 SHORT, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.