Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2017

State v. Peterson

State v. Peterson
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided March 8, 2017

State v. Peterson

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Mayhue Peterson, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2015-001359

Appeal From Florence County William H. Seals, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-107 Submitted January 1, 2017 – Filed March 8, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, and Christopher Mayhue Peterson, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1 WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.