Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2017

State v. Porterfield

State v. Porterfield
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided April 5, 2017

State v. Porterfield

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Anthony M. Porterfield, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2015-000631

Appeal From Richland County R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-141 Submitted January 1, 2017 – Filed April 5, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, and Anthony M. Porterfield, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1 LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.