State v. Young

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Daniel Young, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-001185

Appeal From Orangeburg County

Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-214 Submitted May 1, 2017 – Filed May 24, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

GEATHERS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.