Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2017

State v. Franklin

State v. Franklin
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided May 24, 2017

State v. Franklin

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Wilbert J. Franklin, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2015-002437

Appeal From Sumter County Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-218 Submitted April 1, 2017 – Filed May 24, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Ernest Adolphus Finney, III, of Sumter for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.