In the Matter of Chisolm
In the Matter of Chisolm
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Alton Chisolm, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-002351
Appeal From Charleston County R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-240 Submitted May 1, 2017 – Filed June 7, 2017
APPEAL DISMISSED
James Kristian Falk, of Falk Law Firm, LLC, of Charleston, and Alton Chisolm, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).1 Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.2 WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., and LEE, A.J., concur.
See In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004) (adopting the Anders procedure for alleged no-merit appeals in sexually violent predator involuntary commitment appeals).
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.