State v. Wazney
State v. Wazney
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Robert William Wazney, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2015-000884
Appeal From Sumter County Maité Murphy, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-311 Submitted June 1, 2017 – Filed July 26, 2017
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and Robert William Wazney, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Ernest Adolphus Finney, III, of Sumter, all for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.