SCDSS v. Spencer
SCDSS v. Spencer
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Lori Spencer and Jimmie Hurst, Defendants, Of whom Lori Spencer is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2016-002154
Appeal From Spartanburg County Phillip K. Sinclair, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-287 Submitted June 14, 2017 โ Filed July 10, 2017
AFFIRMED
John Brandt Rucker and Allyson Sue Rucker, both of The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Deborah Murdock Gentry, of Murdock Law Firm, LLC, of Mauldin, for Respondent.
Wendy Nicole Griffith, of Talley Law Firm, P.A., of Spartanburg, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Lori Spencer appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2016). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Spencer's counsel.
AFFIRMED. 1 LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.