Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2017

SCDSS v. Hurst

SCDSS v. Hurst
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided July 10, 2017

SCDSS v. Hurst

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Lori Spencer and Jimmie Hurst, Defendants, Of whom Jimmie Hurst is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2016-001952

Appeal From Spartanburg County Phillip K. Sinclair, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-288 Submitted June 14, 2017 โ€“ Filed July 10, 2017

AFFIRMED

Richard Whitney Allen, of The Law Offices of Richard W. Allen, L.L.C., of Laurens, for Appellant.

Deborah Murdock Gentry, of Murdock Law Firm, LLC, of Mauldin, for Respondent.

Wendy Nicole Griffith, of Talley Law Firm, P.A., of Spartanburg, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Jimmie Hurst appeals the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2016). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.

Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Hurst's counsel.

AFFIRMED. 1 LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.