Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2017

State v. Mateo

State v. Mateo
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided October 11, 2017

State v. Mateo

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Michel Lee Mateo, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-001489

Appeal From Horry County Deadra L. Jefferson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-374 Submitted September 1, 2017 – Filed October 11, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HILL, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.