State v. Skates
State v. Skates
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Cathy Dawn Skates, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-001552
Appeal From Spartanburg County R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-365 Submitted September 1, 2017 – Filed October 4, 2017
APPEAL DISMISSED
Taylor Davis Gilliam, S.C. Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HILL, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.