In the Interest of Miguel E.
In the Interest of Miguel E.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals In the Interest of Miguel E., a Juvenile Under the Age of Seventeen, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-000730
Appeal From Saluda County Robert E. Newton, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-047 Submitted January 1, 2018 – Filed January 31, 2018
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.