Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2018

State v. Conyers

State v. Conyers
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided January 10, 2018

State v. Conyers

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. King Chevais Conyers, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2015-002405

Appeal From Charleston County Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-019 Submitted November 1, 2017 – Filed January 10, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and King Chevais Conyers, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. 1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HILL, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.