State v. Holly E. A. Mahon
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent, v. Holly Earlene Ashby Mahon, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-002521
Appeal From Dorchester County
Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-108
Submitted February 1, 2018 – Filed March 14, 2018
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Holly Earlene Ashby Mahon, pro se, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.