Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2018

State v. Ruff

State v. Ruff
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided June 27, 2018

State v. Ruff

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Kenny Octavis Ruff, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-000136

Appeal From Newberry County Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-285 Submitted May 1, 2018 – Filed June 27, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.