Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2018

SCDSS v. Frazier

SCDSS v. Frazier
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided June 25, 2018

SCDSS v. Frazier

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Sharonda Frazier, Antonio Sanders, and Diane Frazier, Defendants, Of whom Sharonda Frazier is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2017-002112

Appeal From Lexington County Peter R. Nuessle, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-294 Submitted June 20, 2018 โ€“ Filed June 25, 2018

AFFIRMED

Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of Union, for Appellant.

Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent.

Robin Page, of Law Office of Robin Page, LLC, of Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Sharonda Frazier appeals a judicial review order placing her minor child in the custody of Diane Frazier, authorizing the Department of Social Services (DSS) to terminate further services, and allowing DSS to close its case.

See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-1640 (Supp. 2017). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Frazier's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.