Figueroa v. Figueroa
Figueroa v. Figueroa
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Mitria Figueroa, Respondent, v. Jesus E. Figueroa, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-000909
Appeal From Berkeley County Jack A. Landis, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-251 Submitted May 1, 2018 – Filed June 13, 2018
VACATED AND REMANDED
Megan Catherine Hunt Dell, of Dell Family Law, P.C., of Charleston, for Appellant.
Mitria Figueroa, of Goose Creek, pro se.
PER CURIAM: Jesus E. Figueroa (Husband) appeals the family court's summary denial of a Rule 60(b)(1), SCRCP, motion filed by Mitria Figueroa (Wife) which Husband joined in seeking the requested relief.
Our record indicates the family court judge recused himself from the case and simultaneously denied the Rule 60(b)(1) motion. Under these circumstances, we find it appropriate to vacate the order and remand the matter to be reassigned to a different family court judge for consideration of the parties' joint Rule 60(b)(1) motion.
VACATED AND REMANDED.1 SHORT, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.