State v. Smith
State v. Smith
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Joseph Lee Smith, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2017-001036
Appeal From Aiken County Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-298 Submitted June 1, 2018 – Filed July 5, 2018
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of The South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.