State v. Carson
State v. Carson
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Timothy B. Cason, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-001737
Appeal From Anderson County R. Ferrell Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-381 Submitted September 1, 2018 – Filed October 17, 2018
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.