Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2018

State v. Aiken

State v. Aiken
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided October 10, 2018

State v. Aiken

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Carl Stanley Aiken, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-000907

Appeal From Greenville County R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-375 Submitted September 1, 2018 – Filed October 10, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, and Carl Stanley Aiken, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.