Torrence v. SCDC
Torrence v. SCDC
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Thomas J. Torrence, Respondent, v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-000285
Appeal From The Administrative Law Court Deborah Brooks Durden, Administrative Law Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-432 Submitted May 1, 2018 – Filed November 28, 2018
APPEAL DISMISSED
Lake E. Summers, of Malone, Thompson, Summers & Ott, LLC, of Columbia, Appellant.
Thomas J. Torrence, pro se.
PER CURIAM: Appeal dismissed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hosp. Auth. v. S.C. Dep't of Health and Envt'l Control, 387 S.C. 265, 267, 692 S.E.2d 894, 894 (2010) ("The order of the ALC in this case is not a final order. If there is some further act which must be done by the court prior to a determination of the rights of the parties, the order is interlocutory" and not immediately appealable.); S.C. Code Ann. § 1–23– 610(A)(1) (Supp. 2018) (providing for judicial review by this court of "a final decision" of the ALC).
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 HUFF, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.