State v. Smallwood
State v. Smallwood
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Willie Howard Smallwood, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2017-001987
Appeal From Greenville County R. Scott Sprouse, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-472 Submitted November 1, 2018 – Filed December 19, 2018
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.