State v. Mitchum
State v. Mitchum
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Will Rogers Mitchum, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-000225
Appeal From Orangeburg County James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-469 Submitted November 1, 2018 – Filed December 19, 2018
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defenders Robert M. Pachak and LaNelle Cantey DuRant, both of Columbia, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.