State v. Perkins
State v. Perkins
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Jamal B. Perkins, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-000086
Appeal From Chester County Brian M. Gibbons, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-006 Submitted November 1, 2018 – Filed January 4, 2019
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, and Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, both of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Matthew C.
Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and THOMAS and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.