Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019

State v. Gilstrap

State v. Gilstrap
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided January 4, 2019

State v. Gilstrap

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Jimmy Larry Gilstrap, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-001467

Appeal From Pickens County Robert E. Hood, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-001 Submitted November 1, 2018 – Filed January 4, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.