Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019

State v. Baird

State v. Baird
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided February 20, 2019

State v. Baird

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Candice Baird, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-002142

Appeal From Berkeley County Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-087 Submitted January 1, 2019 – Filed February 20, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant.

General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services; and Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.