Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019

State v. Geisendorff

State v. Geisendorff
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided February 13, 2019

State v. Geisendorff

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Billy John Geisendorff, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-001901

Appeal From Lexington County D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-071 Submitted January 1, 2019 – Filed February 13, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia; and Billy John Geisendorff, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and THOMAS and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.