State v. Holt
State v. Holt
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Michael Patton Holt, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-001745
Appeal From Greenwood County Frank R. Addy, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-062 Submitted January 1, 2019 – Filed February 6, 2019
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, and Michael Patton Holt, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.