State v. Hare
State v. Hare
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Braxton Lavon Hare, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2017-001567
Appeal From Greenville County Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-055 Submitted January 1, 2019 – Filed February 6, 2019
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak and Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, both of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.