Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019

SCDSS v. Inabinett

SCDSS v. Inabinett
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided March 25, 2019

SCDSS v. Inabinett

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Tenetia Inabinett and Edward Alexander, III, Defendants, Of whom Tenetia Inabinett is the Appellant, and Edward Alexander, III, is a Respondent.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2018-001045

Appeal From Lexington County Dorothy Mobley Jones, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-122 Submitted March 7, 2019 โ€“ Filed March 25, 2019

AFFIRMED

Lyn Howell Hensel, of Law Office of Lyn Howell Hensel, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent South Carolina Department of Social Services.

Robin Page, of Law Office of Robin Page, LLC, of Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Tenetia Inabinett appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.

Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Inabinett's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.