State v. Rathburn
State v. Rathburn
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Pepper Rose Rathburn, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2017-002560
Appeal From Florence County D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-129 Submitted March 1, 2019 – Filed April 10, 2019
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Matthew C.
Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.