SCDSS v. Smith
SCDSS v. Smith
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Shelly Smith and Dennis Archie, Jr., Defendants, Of whom Shelly Smith is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2019-000032
Appeal From Cherokee County Usha J. Bridges, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-220 Submitted June 17, 2019 โ Filed June 20, 2019
AFFIRMED
Rosalyn Henderson Myers, of Henderson Law Group, of Spartanburg, for Appellant.
Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.
Harry A. Hancock, of Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Shelly Smith appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Smith's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1 WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and HILL, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.