Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019

State v. Kinsey

State v. Kinsey
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided July 17, 2019

State v. Kinsey

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Byron Christopher Kinsey, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-001250

Appeal From Dorchester County Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-263 Submitted June 1, 2019 – Filed July 17, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.