Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019

SCDSS v. Fincher

SCDSS v. Fincher
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided September 25, 2019

SCDSS v. Fincher

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Stacy M. Fincher, Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2018-002191

Appeal From York County David G. Guyton, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-321 Submitted August 23, 2019 โ€“ Filed September 25, 2019

AFFIRMED

Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of Union, for Appellant.

David E. Simpson, of South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Rock Hill, for Respondent.

Rebecca T. McNerney, of Charlotte, N.C., for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Stacy Fincher appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Fincher's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 HUFF, WILLIAMS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.