SCDSS v. Bailey
SCDSS v. Bailey
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. April Bailey and Pierre King, Defendants, Of whom April Bailey is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2019-000128
Appeal From Charleston County Jocelyn B. Cate, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-315 Submitted August 14, 2019 โ Filed September 4, 2019
AFFIRMED
Harry A. Hancock, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Jillian D. Ullman, of South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Charleston, for Respondent.
Alwyn Taylor Silver, of Silver Law Firm, LLC, of Georgetown, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: April Bailey appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Bailey's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1 SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.